deadhand vs keeper security

why sovereign individuals are switching from keeper security to deadhand protocol.

feature	keeper security	deadhand
trust model	password manager	✔ non-custodial
cost	subscription	✔ $400 lifetime
kyc required	yes (identity risk)	✔ no (zero knowledge)
technology	server-side	✔ client-side (shamir)
inheritance	manual / legal	✔ dead man's switch

the bottom line: Keeper Security charges you Subscription and forces you to accept not designed for seed phrases, cloud risk. deadhand is a one-time payment with zero kyc.

why keeper security is a risk

keeper security relies on a password manager model. this means you are ultimately trusting a third party with either your keys, your identity, or your recovery process.

the deadhand advantage

zero knowledge

we don't know who you are. we don't want your ID. we can't access your funds even if we wanted to.

client-side encryption, sharded security

unlike keeper security, deadhand is built on pure math. no recurring fees, no permission asking.

shamir's secret sharing

we split your seed phrase into shards. mathematical security that doesn't rely on legal contracts.

protocol, not service

deadhand is designed to be a set-and-forget protocol. it works even if you disappear for 5 years.

secure your legacy.

stop renting your security from keeper security. own it forever.

secure your vault

no credit card required to test.